休眠一年后“复活”吸金逾80亿，这类债基为何总遭机构“控场”

Group 1 - The core phenomenon observed is the revival of previously dormant fund products, such as Huian Hengli 39-month open-end fund, which attracted significant capital after resuming operations, triggering a proportional allotment mechanism [1][2] - The revival of these bond funds is attributed to several factors, including flexible institutional design, the need for institutional capital allocation, and fluctuations in the bond market [1][4] - The recent increase in attention towards bond funds is evident, with new bond fund issuance in the past month rising nearly 20% compared to the previous month, and bond ETFs seeing a net inflow of over 40 billion yuan in May, a 45% increase [1][6] Group 2 - Huian Hengli 39-month open-end fund saw a significant turnaround, with subscription applications exceeding 8 billion yuan during its recent open period, leading to a confirmation ratio of 92.81% [2][3] - The fund had previously faced challenges, including a drastic reduction in fund shares from 4.2 billion to 100 million and a decrease in the number of holders from 236 to 183 due to insufficient holders during its first open period [3][4] - The fund management announced a fee reduction upon resuming operations, lowering the management fee from 0.3% to 0.15% and the custody fee from 0.06% to 0.05% [3][4] Group 3 - The underlying logic for the revival of these funds is linked to the temporary suspension due to low bond yields, which made the products less competitive, leading to institutional redemptions [5][6] - Once the bond market adjusts and yields become more attractive, fund managers can restart operations, allowing institutional capital to re-enter [5][6] - The recent surge in bond fund popularity is reflected in the public offering market, where bond fund issuance accounted for over 55% of the total in May, an increase of 18.53 percentage points from the previous month [5][6]