北京市消协抽检78件样品 ZARA、UNDER ARMOUR等11件样品存在问题

Core Viewpoint - The Beijing Consumer Association conducted a comparative test on children's clothing, revealing that approximately 14.1% of the 78 samples tested were found to be non-compliant with safety standards [2] Group 1: Test Results - A total of 78 samples from various brands, including FILA, LEE, and Jordan, were tested, with 11 samples from brands like ZARA and Dickies identified as problematic [5] - Four samples were noted for non-compliance in product usage instructions, including discrepancies in durability labels and missing safety category numbers [8] - Issues related to fiber content were highlighted, with certain products exceeding allowable deviation limits and lacking proper labeling, potentially misleading consumers and posing health risks [8] Group 2: Safety Concerns - Specific products, such as those from JELLYBABY and GMIFAMILY, were found to have safety hazards due to improper cord lengths and protruding cords, which could directly endanger children [8] - Color fastness issues were also reported, with nine samples failing to meet standards for wet rubbing fastness, raising concerns about potential health risks from dye absorption through the skin [9] Group 3: Regulatory Standards - The comparative test was conducted based on multiple standards, including GB 31701-2015 and GB/T 5296.4-2012, which outline safety technical requirements and labeling for children's textile products [9]