Workflow
LPLA, SF & Others to Face Penalty for Overcharging Retail Investors
ZACKSยท2025-06-10 15:16

Core Insights - Five brokerage firms have agreed to pay over $19 million in a multistate settlement due to excessive commissions levied on retail investors, particularly on small-dollar transactions [1][11] Settlement Details - The firms will pay up to $9.87 million in fines and costs, in addition to settlement charges to affected clients [2] - Over five years, the firms imposed approximately $19 million in commissions across 1.12 million trades [5] Violations and Regulatory Findings - The North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA) stated that the firms violated state securities laws by applying minimum commission charges often exceeding 5% of the transaction value on low-value transactions, contrary to FINRA Rule 2121 [3][11] - Minimum fees ranged from $25 to $95 per trade, disproportionately affecting low-dollar trades [3] Individual Firm Penalties - Edward Jones accounted for over $11 million in commission charges on more than 780,000 trades and will pay a $100,000 fine and $25,000 in investigative expenses [6] - LPL Financial imposed $2.49 million in excessive commissions on over 127,000 trades and will pay a $25,000 fine [7] - RBC Capital Markets charged nearly $3.4 million with a minimum commission of $95 and will pay a $25,000 fine [7] - Stifel charged a $40 minimum commission, resulting in $885,480.13 across roughly 45,000 transactions, and will pay $30,000 to Massachusetts [8] - TD Ameritrade charged over $913,000 in excessive commissions and will pay a $15,000 fine along with $35,000 in investigative costs [9] Corrective Measures - The firms are required to revise internal policies and supervisory procedures to prevent such practices, ensuring commissions on equity trades do not exceed 5% of the trade's principal amount without documented exceptions [10] Broader Implications - More than 20 additional states have expressed interest in joining the settlement, which could increase fines and regulatory pressure on these firms [12]