都市车界|汽车行业打响"反内卷"第一枪：多家车企集体承诺账期不超60天

Core Viewpoint - The automotive industry is collectively responding to the "involution" phenomenon by unifying supplier payment terms to within 60 days, marking a significant shift in supply chain management and compliance with new national regulations [1][10][14]. Group 1: Industry Response - GAC Group initiated the movement by emphasizing the link between supply chain health and product quality, committing to a payment term of no more than 60 days [2]. - China FAW followed suit, highlighting its commitment from a national strategy perspective and outlining specific measures to enhance processes and technology [4]. - Dongfeng Motor, as a representative of the industry, stated that the unified payment term is a response to national policies and reflects its role in the supply chain [6]. - New energy vehicle representative, Seres, reiterated its consistent practice of a 60-day payment term and called for industry self-discipline [8]. - Other major players like Changan Automobile and Geely also joined the initiative, further solidifying the collective commitment to the 60-day payment term [10]. Group 2: Underlying Issues - The collective statements from multiple automakers are a response to long-standing frustrations within the automotive supply chain, as highlighted by a public letter from a supplier that expressed the desire for timely payments [12]. - The competitive pressure has led to extended payment terms, with some companies reporting accounts payable turnover days exceeding 90 days, and in some cases, reaching 120 days or more [12]. - The chaotic competition has drawn regulatory attention, with recent government regulations mandating that large enterprises must complete payments to small and medium-sized enterprises within 60 days [13]. Group 3: Future Implications - The unified commitment to a 60-day payment term is seen as a critical step towards rationalizing competition in the automotive market, potentially alleviating the pressure on suppliers and improving their cash flow [14]. - This collective action signifies a major shift in supply chain management philosophy within the automotive industry, moving towards a healthier ecosystem [14]. - The initiative may represent a turning point for the Chinese automotive industry, transitioning from a "zero-sum game" to a "win-win" scenario, supported by both policy guidance and industry self-regulation [14].