业界担忧“60天账期承诺”可操作空间大，车企如何履约仍需细化

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles revolves around the commitment made by 17 leading domestic automotive brands to unify supplier payment terms to within 60 days, raising questions about the feasibility and implementation of this promise [1][2] - Concerns have been expressed regarding the calculation of the 60-day payment period, whether it starts from delivery, acceptance, or invoicing, and the methods of payment, which could include cash or non-cash instruments [1][2] - Industry insiders highlight that the payment process is complex, with potential delays at various stages, and merely promising a 60-day payment period is insufficient without clear timelines for each step of the supply process [2] Group 2 - Analysts note that extending supplier payment terms effectively acts as an "interest-free loan" for automotive companies, allowing them to avoid bank loan interest while shifting financial burdens onto suppliers [2] - Among the 17 companies that made the 60-day payment commitment, only SAIC Group and BAIC Group explicitly stated they would not use commercial acceptance bills that could increase financial pressure on suppliers [2] - The lack of detailed implementation guidelines for the 60-day payment commitment raises skepticism about whether these promises will be fulfilled in practice [1][2]