开启智驾可以避免酒驾？没有驾驶证也能开？这些关于智驾的误区司机必须了解

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the distinction between "assisted driving" and "autonomous driving," highlighting that many drivers mistakenly equate the two, leading to dangerous situations and accidents [17][15][10]. Group 1: Accidents and Misuse of Assisted Driving - Recent accidents illustrate the dangers of over-reliance on assisted driving features, with drivers failing to take control when necessary, resulting in collisions [4][6]. - In one incident, a driver was found fully responsible for an accident due to trusting the assisted driving system too much and not reacting in time [4][6]. - Another case involved a driver who crashed into a guardrail while using assisted driving, again highlighting the risks associated with neglecting personal responsibility [4][6]. Group 2: Levels of Autonomous Driving - China's automotive intelligent driving is classified into six levels, ranging from L0 (emergency assistance) to L5 (full automation) [9][10]. - Currently, most vehicles on the market are at L2 or below, which means they provide combined driving assistance but still require driver intervention [10][12]. - Levels L3 and above are still in demonstration or testing phases and are not available for personal purchase [12]. Group 3: Legal Responsibilities and Misconceptions - The legal obligations of drivers using assisted driving systems are the same as those of regular drivers, meaning they must remain attentive and ready to take control [15][17]. - Misconceptions exist, such as the belief that using assisted driving can absolve drivers of responsibility in cases of DUI, which is incorrect [19][25]. - Courts have ruled that drivers are still accountable for their actions, even when using assisted driving features, reinforcing the need for proper licensing and adherence to traffic laws [31][33]. Group 4: Manufacturer Responsibilities - Manufacturers must ensure that their marketing does not mislead consumers into thinking that assisted driving equates to full automation, as this could lead to legal repercussions [38][40]. - If accidents occur while using assisted driving, the responsibility typically lies with the driver, but manufacturers may be held accountable if the technology is found to be faulty [42][40]. - Experts suggest that as technology evolves, legal frameworks must also adapt to clarify responsibilities and rights associated with different levels of automated driving [43][45].