戳穿赖清德“民主”幌子下的“台独”本质

Group 1 - The core argument is that the actions of Lai Ching-te and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) are seen as a facade for promoting "Taiwan independence" under the guise of "democracy and freedom," misleading both the international community and the Taiwanese public [1][2][3] - The DPP is accused of distorting the concept of "one China" and using it to label legitimate governance as "authoritarian," while framing their separatist actions as a defense of democracy [2][3] - The DPP's policies are characterized as a form of "green terror," suppressing dissent and limiting freedom of expression through political persecution and media manipulation [3][4] Group 2 - The DPP's military budget has reached historical highs, and they are implementing policies aimed at creating a wartime society, which is seen as a provocation that undermines cross-strait relations [4] - Public dissatisfaction with Lai Ching-te's governance is highlighted, with over 53% of the population expressing discontent, marking the highest dissatisfaction rate for a leader's first anniversary in nearly 30 years [4] - The DPP's economic policies are criticized for exacerbating wealth inequality and failing to address the low wage crisis faced by the younger generation in Taiwan [4][5] Group 3 - The article emphasizes that the essence of democracy is to ensure that the people's will is reflected in governance, contrasting this with the DPP's approach [5] - It argues that only under the framework of national unity can the democratic rights and welfare of Taiwanese people be genuinely safeguarded [5][6] - The narrative concludes that any separatist actions disguised as "democracy" are a betrayal of historical justice and national integrity, with a warning that those who persist in such actions will be condemned by history [6]