Workflow
菱电电控: 北京市中伦文德律师事务所关于武汉菱电汽车电控系统股份有限公司2025年第二次临时股东大会法律意见书

Group 1 - The legal opinion letter was issued by Zhonglun Wende Law Firm regarding the second extraordinary general meeting of shareholders of Wuhan Lingdian Automotive Electric Control System Co., Ltd. scheduled for June 2025 [1][2] - The law firm confirmed that the company provided all necessary documents and materials for the issuance of the legal opinion, ensuring their authenticity and completeness [2][3] - The legal opinion focuses on the legality of the meeting's convening, procedures, qualifications of attendees, and voting results, without commenting on the content of the proposals discussed [2][3] Group 2 - The extraordinary general meeting was convened by the company's board of directors based on a resolution from the 29th meeting of the third board of directors held on May 29, 2025 [3][4] - The meeting was held on June 13, 2025, at the company's office in Wuhan, combining both on-site and online voting methods [3][4] - The meeting's notice was published on the Shanghai Stock Exchange website, detailing the time, location, convenor, and agenda [3][4] Group 3 - A total of 27 shareholders attended the meeting, representing 30,750,030 shares, which is 59.3490% of the total shares [4][5] - Among the attendees, 23 were small investors holding less than 5% of the shares, representing 299,608 shares [5] - The qualifications of all attendees and the convenor were confirmed to be valid and in compliance with relevant laws and regulations [5][6] Group 4 - The voting process involved both on-site and online methods, with the online voting conducted through the Shanghai Stock Exchange's system [6][7] - The voting results showed overwhelming support for the proposals, with the first proposal receiving 30,745,730 votes in favor, accounting for 99.9860% of the valid votes [6][7] - The second proposal also received significant support, with 30,741,832 votes in favor, representing 99.9733% of the valid votes [6][7] Group 5 - The voting results for small investors indicated that 295,308 shares were voted in favor of the first proposal, which is 98.5647% of the small investors' valid votes [6][7] - The legal opinion concluded that the convening, procedures, qualifications, and voting results of the meeting were all in compliance with the Company Law and relevant regulations [25]