Xin Lang Cai Jing·2025-06-18 09:12Core Viewpoint - Hefei Taihe Intelligent Technology Group Co., Ltd. announced the acquisition of 100% equity in Anhui Sunshine Yuchu New Energy Co., Ltd. for 45.8 million yuan, which raises concerns due to the target company's ongoing losses and high debt levels [1][2][4]. Group 1: Acquisition Details - The acquisition involves Anhui Sunshine Yuchu, a subsidiary of Sunshine New Energy, which focuses on energy storage projects for commercial users [1]. - The transaction is classified as a related party transaction, as Sunshine New Energy is both the parent company of Anhui Sunshine Yuchu and the controlling shareholder of Taihe Intelligent [1]. - The asset evaluation report indicates that as of March 31, 2025, the book value of Anhui Sunshine Yuchu's equity was 43.116 million yuan, with an assessed value of 45.8 million yuan, reflecting a value increase of 2.684 million yuan (6.23%) [1]. Group 2: Financial Performance - Anhui Sunshine Yuchu reported a revenue of 19.7761 million yuan in 2024, accounting for 3.51% of Taihe Intelligent's total revenue, with a net loss of 6.1321 million yuan [2]. - In Q1 2025, the company's revenue increased to 15.7029 million yuan, representing 15% of Taihe Intelligent's revenue, but the net loss expanded to 22.6566 million yuan [2]. - The significant loss in Q1 2025 was attributed to asset impairment, with a provision of 26.5775 million yuan for fixed asset impairment [2]. Group 3: Strategic Implications - Taihe Intelligent has acknowledged that it lacks experience in the commercial energy storage sector and that the acquisition of a loss-making asset poses significant cross-industry operational risks [2][4]. - The company is undergoing a change in control, with Sunshine New Energy becoming the new controlling shareholder, which may influence its strategic direction [3]. - The acquisition raises questions about the rationale behind a profitable AI visual recognition company acquiring a loss-making energy storage asset, especially given the financial performance disparity [4].