DOGE之后，特朗普如何打怪升级︱南洋飞语

Core Points - The article discusses the political dynamics in the U.S. following Trump's return to power, highlighting the conflict between populist leaders, academic elites, tech oligarchs, and progressive state governments [1][6] - Trump's aggressive policy initiatives aim to dismantle established institutions and alliances, leveraging political opportunities to reshape the political landscape [1][6] Group 1: Harvard University - Harvard is portrayed as a symbolic target for conservatives, representing both knowledge power and leftist moral discourse [2] - Trump's administration has frozen approximately $2.2 billion in research funding from the National Science Foundation (NSF), National Institutes of Health (NIH), and the Pentagon to Harvard [2] - Proposed tax increases on wealthy schools and restrictions on international student admissions are aimed at diminishing Harvard's influence and reallocating federal funds to other institutions [2] Group 2: California - California is described as a "laboratory" for progressive policies, with significant implications for national policy [3] - Trump's federal immigration enforcement actions target sanctuary cities, threatening to suspend federal infrastructure funding for non-compliance [3] - The introduction of "reverse green transfer payments" links federal funding to state emissions targets, effectively reducing California's share of federal infrastructure funds [3] Group 3: Elon Musk - Musk is identified as a key player whose relationship with Trump has soured, leading to public disputes over policy impacts on his businesses [4] - The cancellation of electric vehicle tax credits could result in over $3 billion in annual losses for Tesla, affecting its clean energy transition efforts [4] - Musk's ambitions for his platform X face regulatory challenges from the government, particularly concerning financial transactions and data privacy [4] Group 4: Political Strategy - Trump's negotiation tactics involve leveraging funding and regulatory pressures against Harvard, California, and Musk to gain political advantage [5] - The strategy creates uncertainty, compelling opponents to react defensively, thereby consolidating Trump's influence [6] - The ongoing political battles have led to structural shifts in the U.S. political, business, and academic landscapes, with various stakeholders recalibrating their strategies in response [6]