两市ETF融资余额减少1.34亿元

Summary of Key Points Core Viewpoint - The latest balance of ETF margin trading in the two markets is 99.525 billion yuan, showing a decrease of 277 million yuan compared to the previous trading day, indicating a slight decline in investor activity in ETF margin trading [1]. ETF Margin Trading Overview - As of June 20, the total ETF margin trading balance is 99.525 billion yuan, down 0.28% from the previous day, with a financing balance of 94.352 billion yuan and a securities lending balance of 7.09 billion yuan [1]. - The Shenzhen market's ETF margin trading balance is 33.387 billion yuan, while the Shanghai market's balance is 66.138 billion yuan, both showing declines [1]. Notable ETFs by Financing Balance - There are 106 ETFs with financing balances exceeding 100 million yuan, with the highest being Huaan Gold ETF at 8.553 billion yuan, followed by E Fund Gold ETF and Huaxia Hang Seng ETF at 6.793 billion yuan and 4.836 billion yuan respectively [2]. - The ETFs with the largest increases in financing balance include the CSI 500 ETF Fund, with a growth of 429.43%, and the GF CSI 1000 ETF, with a growth of 101.34% [2][3]. Margin Trading Changes - The top three ETFs for net financing purchases are Southern CSI 500 ETF, Bosera Convertible Bond ETF, and Pengyang 30-Year Treasury Bond ETF, with net purchases of 198 million yuan, 107 million yuan, and 73.4 million yuan respectively [5]. - Conversely, the ETFs with the highest net financing sales include Huaxia SSE 50 ETF and Hang Seng Technology ETF, with net sales of 95.6 million yuan and 75.8 million yuan respectively [4][5]. Securities Lending Overview - The top three ETFs by securities lending balance are Southern CSI 1000 ETF, Southern CSI 500 ETF, and Huaxia CSI 1000 ETF, with balances of 1.830 billion yuan, 1.555 billion yuan, and 368 million yuan respectively [5]. - The largest increase in securities lending balance was seen in the Fortune CSI A500 ETF, which increased by 178.58% [6]. Summary of Margin Trading Changes - The overall trend indicates a decrease in both financing and securities lending balances across various ETFs, reflecting a cautious sentiment among investors [1][2][5].