Core Viewpoint - The article discusses former Secretary of State Blinken's criticism of President Trump's recent military actions against Iran's nuclear facilities, labeling them as "wrong," "unwise," and "unnecessary" [1][3]. Group 1: Criticism of Trump's Actions - Blinken argues that if Trump had not withdrawn from the Iran nuclear deal during his first term, the current situation would not have escalated to this point [1][3]. - He states that Trump's actions are an attempt to extinguish a fire that he himself has fueled by exiting the agreement, which led to Iran accelerating its uranium enrichment process [1][3]. Group 2: Diplomatic Solutions - Blinken emphasizes that there is still time to resolve the issue through diplomatic means and that the situation is not as urgent as Trump portrays it to be [3]. - He acknowledges that while the recent strikes may have delayed Iran's nuclear program, they could also provoke further aggression from Iran, potentially exacerbating the very issues the U.S. aims to prevent [3]. Group 3: Military Actions and Responses - Trump announced successful strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities, namely Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan, on the evening of the 21st [3]. - In retaliation, Iran conducted missile strikes on the U.S. Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar on the 23rd, following the U.S. actions [3]. - Despite a temporary agreement for a "comprehensive ceasefire" between Israel and Iran, both sides accused each other of violating the ceasefire shortly after, leading to renewed hostilities [3].
布林肯抨击特朗普政府空袭伊朗核设施:错误、不明智且不必要
Huan Qiu Wang·2025-06-25 01:53