Workflow
述评|歪曲事实 违背法理——赖清德杜撰“台独”论述注定徒劳
Xin Hua She·2025-06-25 15:52

Core Viewpoint - The article argues that the "Taiwan independence" narrative promoted by Lai Ching-te is fundamentally flawed and lacks legal and factual basis, asserting that Taiwan has always been a part of China and that any attempts to claim otherwise are destined to fail [1][8]. Summary by Sections Challenge to International Law Authority - Lai Ching-te claims that "Taiwan is a country," deliberately ignoring international legal documents such as the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation, while misusing the San Francisco Peace Treaty to assert a false legitimacy for "Taiwan independence" [2][3]. - The article emphasizes that Taiwan has historically belonged to China, with clear legal and factual evidence supporting this claim, including the return of Taiwan to China as stated in international agreements post-World War II [2][3]. Misinterpretation of the San Francisco Peace Treaty - The article critiques Lai's assertion that the San Francisco Peace Treaty did not return Taiwan to the People's Republic of China, labeling this interpretation as a challenge to international law [3][4]. - It argues that the treaty is invalid regarding Taiwan's sovereignty, as it was signed without the participation of the legitimate Chinese government, thus lacking any legal authority over Taiwan [3][4]. Distortion of UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 - Lai's claim that Resolution 2758 does not address Taiwan's status is seen as a blatant challenge to the authority of the United Nations and the post-war international order [5][6]. - The article clarifies that the resolution was designed to address the representation of all of China, including Taiwan, and that the absence of specific mention of Taiwan does not imply a separate status [6][7]. Historical Context and Current Consensus - The article highlights that the victory in the Anti-Japanese War and the subsequent return of Taiwan to China are significant historical events that cannot be altered by Lai's fabricated arguments [8]. - It concludes that the international community largely adheres to the one-China principle, and any attempts at "Taiwan independence" are unlikely to succeed [8].