Group 1 - The NATO summit concluded with a focus on increasing defense spending, with member countries committing to raise their annual defense budgets to 5% of GDP by 2035, excluding the United States [3][4][7] - The summit's final declaration was notably the shortest in NATO's history, emphasizing the U.S. priority of defense spending while sidelining European concerns, particularly regarding Ukraine [8][9] - The lack of substantial commitments to Ukraine during the summit indicates a shift in focus towards appeasing U.S. demands, with Ukraine's status significantly downgraded [8][9] Group 2 - NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg's comments likening President Trump to a "father" during the summit sparked controversy, reflecting the dynamics of U.S. leadership within NATO [2][6] - European nations, including the UK and Poland, expressed intentions to meet the new defense spending targets, while some members like Spain and Belgium showed reluctance, indicating internal divisions on achieving the 5% goal [7][8] - The absence of a comprehensive aid plan for Ukraine and the lack of a clear path for its NATO membership highlight a potential shift in U.S. foreign policy priorities [8][9]
这场北约峰会：一个“国际玩笑”火了 美国优先 欧洲议题遭无视
Xin Hua Wang·2025-06-26 09:00