哈梅内伊称“战胜”美以 浓缩铀哪去了再出“罗生门”

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles revolves around Iran's claims of victory over the US and Israel in the recent conflict, as articulated by Supreme Leader Khamenei, who stated that Iran has successfully struck back against both adversaries [1][3][4] - Khamenei's speech marks the third public address since the conflict escalated, emphasizing Iran's military achievements against Israel and the US [2] - The Iranian parliament has officially passed a law to suspend cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), indicating a significant shift in Iran's nuclear policy [5][7] Group 2 - There is a lack of consensus among the US, Israel, and Iran regarding the extent of damage to Iran's nuclear facilities and whether uranium has been relocated, leading to a "Rashomon" effect of conflicting narratives [8][9] - Iran claims that its nuclear facilities have not suffered significant damage and that enriched uranium remains intact, while US and Israeli officials assert that Iran's nuclear program has been severely impacted [9][13][16] - The IAEA has stated it is unaware of any relocation of enriched uranium, further complicating the situation [18] Group 3 - The potential for future negotiations between the US and Iran regarding nuclear issues has been hinted at, with US President Trump mentioning upcoming talks, although Iran's foreign minister has denied any plans to resume negotiations at this time [18][19] - Analysts suggest that Iran may be employing a strategy of ambiguity regarding its nuclear capabilities to strengthen its position in any future negotiations with the US [20]