Group 1 - The core point of the article revolves around President Trump's threat to sue The New York Times and CNN for publishing a report that contradicts the official narrative regarding the effectiveness of U.S. military strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities [1][3] - Trump's private lawyer claimed that the report harmed the president's reputation and demanded a retraction and apology, labeling the report as "false" and "defamatory" [1] - The New York Times and CNN both confirmed the validity of the intelligence assessment from the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency, which stated that the strikes only delayed Iran's nuclear program by a few months and did not destroy key components [3][4] Group 2 - Iranian officials, including the head of the Atomic Energy Organization, stated that measures have been taken to ensure the continuity of Iran's nuclear program despite military strikes [4] - The Iranian government is assessing the damage caused by the attacks and has prepared a plan to restart operations without interruption [4] - The International Atomic Energy Agency's director general acknowledged that while the Iranian facilities suffered significant damage, claims that the strikes set back Iran's nuclear program "decades" are seen as political assessments rather than factual [5]
特朗普因伊核设施问题威胁起诉两家美媒,《纽约时报》强硬回应:不撤回、不道歉
Huan Qiu Wang·2025-06-27 01:27