“出生公民权”之争：美高院裁决地区法官无权发布全国禁令阻止特朗普政府

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that federal district judges do not have the authority to issue nationwide injunctions against the Trump administration's executive order to limit birthright citizenship, allowing the administration to proceed with its measures [1][3]. Group 1: Supreme Court Ruling - The Supreme Court, controlled by conservatives, voted 6 to 3 to approve the Trump administration's request, limiting the scope of federal district judges' injunctions to only the states, groups, and individuals that filed lawsuits [1]. - The ruling did not address the constitutionality of the Trump administration's executive order itself [1]. Group 2: Reactions to the Ruling - Three liberal justices expressed dissent, with Justice Sonia Sotomayor labeling the Trump administration's actions as "blatantly unconstitutional" and "manipulative" [1]. - Immigration groups expressed disappointment and concern, stating that the ruling would lead to "chaos, inequality, and fear" [1]. Group 3: Background on Birthright Citizenship - The birthright citizenship policy has been in place for over 100 years, ensuring that anyone born in the U.S. is granted citizenship regardless of their parents' status [3]. - On January 20, the Trump administration signed an executive order to eliminate birthright citizenship, stating that newborns of non-citizen or non-permanent resident parents would not automatically receive U.S. citizenship [3]. - This executive order triggered a series of legal challenges, with federal district judges in Maryland, Washington, and Massachusetts issuing nationwide injunctions to block its implementation [3].