国际观察丨美以加沙援助项目：救济还是陷阱？

Core Viewpoint - The humanitarian aid project in Gaza, supported by the US and Israel, is criticized as a "death trap" that weaponizes humanitarian assistance for political and military objectives, leading to significant civilian casualties and international condemnation [1][2][4]. Group 1: Humanitarian Aid Distribution - The "Gaza Humanitarian Foundation," backed by the US and Israel, has taken control of aid distribution in Gaza, resulting in over 500 deaths and more than 4,000 injuries since its takeover [1]. - The distribution points set by the foundation are primarily located within areas controlled by Israeli military firepower, limiting the access of UN agencies to distribute aid [2]. - Reports indicate that civilians face "deadly risks" while seeking food and aid, with incidents of gunfire occurring near distribution sites [2][3]. Group 2: International Response and Criticism - The United Nations has condemned the aid distribution practices, stating that the losses caused by the project outweigh the lives saved, labeling it a "death trap" [3]. - International aid organizations have criticized the foundation for its inadequate response to the needs of the Gazan population, forcing people to travel long distances under dangerous conditions [2][4]. - The UN Secretary-General and other international leaders have denounced the actions of Israel as a violation of humanitarian principles, equating the diversion of aid to a form of murder [4]. Group 3: Political Implications - Analysts suggest that the primary aim of the US and Israel in establishing the "Gaza Humanitarian Foundation" is to undermine Hamas's influence in Gaza by replacing UN-led aid distribution mechanisms [4][5]. - The situation in Gaza is seen as part of a broader strategy to limit Palestinian autonomy and control, aligning with previous political plans proposed by US leadership [5]. - The ongoing humanitarian crisis and international isolation of the Israeli government may lead to a shift in policy, with potential for ceasefire discussions in the near future [6].