环保产业怎样从“有没有”转向“好不好”

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the need for a higher level of planning and execution in ecological and environmental protection amidst increasing pressures on ecological civilization construction [1] - The ecological and environmental protection industry has shown steady growth, significantly enhancing the "green content" of China's economic development, with over 95% of coal-fired power units achieving ultra-low emissions and a target PM2.5 concentration of below 30 micrograms per cubic meter by the end of 2024 [1][2] - The "Three North" shelter forest program has seen a significant increase in forest coverage from approximately 5% in the 1970s to 13.84% currently, with companies like Mongolian Grass Ecology participating in substantial project areas [1] Group 2 - The ecological and environmental protection industry faces structural, systemic, and scale-related bottlenecks that hinder its high-quality development, necessitating technological innovation and structural adjustments [2] - There is a shift from merely having ecological projects to focusing on their quality, indicating a critical transition period for the industry [2] Group 3 - Strengthening policy support is crucial, including increased central budget investments in ecological infrastructure and the utilization of various supportive policies for domestic equipment replacement [3] - A complete technological innovation ecosystem is needed, focusing on low-carbon processes, carbon capture, and resource recycling, with an emphasis on collaboration between industry, academia, and research [3] Group 4 - New market opportunities should be cultivated, encouraging businesses to engage in greenhouse gas accounting, new pollutant management, and digitalized ecological governance [4] - The development of new business models, such as environmental service contracting and "environmental steward" services, is essential to reduce pollution control costs for small and medium-sized enterprises [4]