“智驾险”能给人们的出行安全兜底吗

Core Viewpoint - The emergence of "Intelligent Driving Insurance" (智驾险) aims to provide coverage for potential risks associated with the use of intelligent driving assistance technologies, addressing consumer concerns and enhancing their confidence in these features [2][3]. Group 1: Industry Developments - Numerous automotive companies and insurance firms are launching targeted products, such as "Intelligent Driving Insurance," to alleviate consumer worries regarding the safety of intelligent driving technologies [2]. - The increasing adoption of intelligent driving features, such as automatic parking and lane-keeping assistance, is accelerating the transition to a new era of "human-machine co-driving" [2]. - Companies are focusing on "equalizing intelligent driving" by integrating advanced technologies into more vehicles while addressing user safety concerns [2]. Group 2: Consumer Experience - A consumer shared that the psychological comfort provided by "Intelligent Driving Insurance" encouraged them to try automatic parking, although they later experienced a minor accident [3]. - The claims process for "Intelligent Driving Insurance" can be complex, raising doubts about the reliability of intelligent driving features and the insurance itself [4][5]. Group 3: Legal and Regulatory Issues - There are ongoing disputes regarding legal responsibilities and liability divisions related to "Intelligent Driving Insurance," questioning whether it serves merely as a risk transfer tool or as essential psychological support for consumers embracing new technologies [3][8]. - The lack of clear legal standards for determining responsibility in intelligent driving scenarios complicates the claims process, as current laws do not adequately address the division of liability between users and manufacturers [8][9]. - The insurance products marketed as "Intelligent Driving Insurance" are often not true insurance products but rather value-added services provided by automotive companies, with insurance companies acting as partners in risk assessment and compensation [5][6]. Group 4: Data and Responsibility - The absence of clear regulations regarding data ownership, usage rights, and protection complicates the interactions between automotive manufacturers, system suppliers, vehicle owners, and insurance companies [8][10]. - The current legal framework does not establish standards for the division of responsibility in accidents involving intelligent driving systems, leading to disputes over whether issues arise from system failures or user errors [9][10]. - Establishing clear rules for data storage and usage is essential for ensuring the integrity of accident data and maintaining the legal rights of all parties involved [10].