【环时深度】利益冲突和信任缺失成了美伊核谈判两大堵点

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the current state of US-Iran nuclear negotiations, highlighting the challenges and complexities arising from recent events, including Israeli attacks on Iran and the lack of trust between the parties involved [1][12]. Summary by Sections Progress in Negotiations - The first five rounds of indirect talks between the US and Iran resulted in four key agreements: 1. Iran agreed to implement the highest level of transparency and verification mechanisms for its nuclear facilities [2]. 2. Iran consented to dilute or transfer 400 kilograms of enriched uranium to prevent the possibility of building nuclear weapons [2]. 3. Iran will reduce the enrichment level of uranium to below 5% for civilian reserves, alleviating concerns about its potential to enrich uranium to weapon-grade levels [2]. 4. Iran will cooperate with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to resolve remaining technical issues [2]. Challenges in Negotiations - The negotiations face significant hurdles due to differing perceptions of sanctions relief. The US insists on Iran taking specific actions first, while Iran views phased sanctions relief as a prerequisite for negotiations [6]. - The core conflict lies in the US's belief that Iran's nuclear program aims to develop weapons, while Iran maintains that its nuclear activities are for peaceful purposes [7]. Impact of Regional Dynamics - The article notes the cyclical nature of the conflict, where Iran's nuclear development prompts Israeli military actions, leading to further negotiations and escalations [5]. - The Israeli policy of "nuclear ambiguity" complicates the situation, as Iran perceives attacks from a nation that does not openly acknowledge its nuclear arsenal as unjustifiable [6]. Potential Withdrawal from NPT - Following recent conflicts, Iran is considering drafting a bill to withdraw from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), which could lead to severe diplomatic and security challenges for Iran [8][9]. - The article emphasizes that while there are calls within Iran to exit the NPT, such a move would be detrimental to its international standing and security [9]. US Domestic Perspectives - There is a notable preference among the American public for diplomatic solutions over military action regarding Iran's nuclear program, with a majority opposing military strikes [11]. - The article highlights internal divisions within the US government regarding the approach to Iran, with some advocating for military action while others support diplomatic engagement [10]. Future of Negotiations - The article concludes that the path to resuming negotiations is fraught with difficulties, particularly due to Iran's low trust in the US following military actions and the need for assurances against further attacks during negotiations [12]. - Despite the challenges, there remains hope for a peaceful resolution, emphasizing the importance of diplomatic efforts to stabilize the situation in the Middle East [12].