鑫慷嘉平台被曝崩盘：当资金盘与稳定币挂钩，资金被快速跨境转移

Core Viewpoint - The "Xin Kang Jia" platform is suspected to be a Ponzi scheme combined with a multi-level marketing structure, leading to significant financial losses for investors, with estimates of around 13 billion yuan involved and approximately 2 million investors affected [3][19][24]. Group 1: Platform Structure and Operations - "Xin Kang Jia" was initially presented as a platform for oil and commodity trading, later claiming to engage in futures trading linked to the Dubai Gold and Commodities Exchange (DGCX), promising high returns of up to 0.2% daily [4][10]. - The platform utilized a nine-level hierarchical structure to incentivize recruitment, with varying rewards based on the number of direct referrals, creating a system that heavily relied on new investor contributions to pay returns to earlier investors [10][11]. - The platform's operations involved the use of stablecoins like USDT for transactions, complicating the process for new investors who often transferred funds to higher-level members for conversion, thus bypassing direct investment [15][16]. Group 2: Regulatory Warnings and Risks - Regulatory bodies had issued multiple warnings regarding the risks associated with "Xin Kang Jia," highlighting its illegal fundraising activities and the lack of legitimate investment projects [17][18][24]. - The DGCX publicly denied any affiliation with "Xin Kang Jia," emphasizing that the platform had no authorization to operate under its name, further indicating the fraudulent nature of the claims made by the platform [6][19]. - The rise of stablecoins has led to a resurgence of similar schemes, with many platforms adopting these digital currencies to evade financial regulations, posing significant risks to investors [20][24]. Group 3: Investor Experiences and Consequences - Many investors were lured into the scheme by promises of high returns and the belief that the investment was legitimate, often encouraged by friends or acquaintances [14][23]. - Once the platform collapsed, investors found themselves unable to withdraw their funds, leading to widespread panic and the dissolution of investor groups [14][22]. - The investigation revealed that the platform's associated company had a registered capital of 30 million yuan but had not actually contributed any capital, raising further red flags about its legitimacy [14].