Core Viewpoint - Investors are evaluating WNS (Holdings) Limited and Thomson Reuters for potential value opportunities in the Business - Services sector, with WNS currently presenting a stronger case for investment [1]. Valuation Metrics - WNS has a forward P/E ratio of 16.27, significantly lower than Thomson Reuters' forward P/E of 51.03, indicating WNS may be undervalued [5]. - The PEG ratio for WNS is 1.79, while TRI's PEG ratio is 6.17, suggesting WNS has a more favorable earnings growth outlook relative to its price [5]. - WNS's P/B ratio stands at 4.12 compared to TRI's 7.34, further supporting the notion that WNS is a better value option [6]. Earnings Outlook - WNS holds a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy), indicating a stronger improvement in its earnings outlook compared to Thomson Reuters, which has a Zacks Rank of 3 (Hold) [3]. - Based on the combination of valuation metrics and earnings outlook, WNS is positioned as the superior value investment at this time [6].
WNS or TRI: Which Is the Better Value Stock Right Now?