【环时深度】毁绿保油气，美能源政策加速“开倒车”

Core Viewpoint - The "Big and Beautiful" Act signed by Trump is seen as a significant shift in U.S. energy policy, favoring fossil fuels over renewable energy, which may have devastating effects on clean energy development and the U.S.'s international climate responsibilities [1][3][12]. Group 1: Policy Changes - The "Big and Beautiful" Act effectively repeals or undermines much of the Biden administration's Inflation Reduction Act, particularly in terms of clean energy support [1][3]. - The Act prioritizes fossil fuels, reduces regulations, and limits support for renewable energy, marking a systematic shift in energy policy [3][4]. - Solar and wind energy sectors are identified as the biggest losers under the new law, with tax credits for new projects being significantly restricted [3][4]. Group 2: Industry Reactions - Traditional fossil fuel industries have welcomed the Act, viewing it as transformative legislation that addresses their priorities [4][5]. - Critics argue that the Act will lead to higher energy costs and weaken the U.S. automotive industry, while proponents claim it will lower energy prices by increasing domestic production [5][4]. Group 3: Historical Context - The U.S. has a long history of inconsistent energy policies, often influenced by political changes and various interest groups, leading to a lack of coherent long-term strategy [6][9]. - Previous administrations have oscillated between promoting renewable energy and supporting fossil fuels, with significant policy reversals occurring with each change in leadership [8][9]. Group 4: International Implications - The Act is seen as a step back from global climate commitments, potentially damaging the U.S.'s international image and its ability to compete in the clean energy sector [12][10]. - Allies have expressed concerns over U.S. energy policies, particularly regarding trade discrimination and the potential for increased competition for investments [10][11]. Group 5: Future Outlook - Despite the federal shift, individual states may continue to support clean energy initiatives based on their specific industry needs, indicating a potential divergence in energy policy at the state level [13].