以工代赈并非“排斥先进生产力”

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of the "work-for-relief" policy in promoting employment and improving livelihoods, highlighting its complexity and the need for tailored implementation to ensure effective use of limited financial resources [1][4]. Summary by Relevant Sections Policy Implementation and Financial Support - The National Development and Reform Commission has allocated an additional 10 billion yuan in central budget investment to support 1,975 projects across 26 provinces and regions, with an expected labor remuneration of 4.59 billion yuan, benefiting 310,000 key groups [1]. - By the end of June, a total of 29.5 billion yuan in central investment has been allocated for the 2025 fiscal year, supporting nearly 6,000 work-for-relief projects, which are expected to create employment for over 700,000 disadvantaged individuals and distribute more than 11 billion yuan in labor remuneration [1]. Employment and Economic Impact - The work-for-relief policy, initiated in 1984, has evolved from targeted poverty alleviation to comprehensive support, creating job opportunities and enhancing skills for low-income groups [2]. - The policy primarily targets low-income individuals in rural and underdeveloped areas, focusing on small-scale infrastructure projects that require minimal skills, allowing farmers to work locally without disrupting agricultural production [2]. Policy Objectives and Outcomes - The essence of the work-for-relief policy is to utilize government intervention for redistributing resources, significantly aiding in employment and improving living standards for vulnerable populations [3]. - The new management measures aim to promote integrated relief models that combine infrastructure construction, labor remuneration, skills training, and job creation, enhancing the competitiveness of beneficiaries in the job market [3]. Challenges and Future Directions - Despite overall economic stability, employment challenges persist, particularly for disadvantaged groups in underdeveloped regions, indicating a continued need for the work-for-relief policy [4]. - The article calls for a scientific understanding of the policy's complexities and the necessity for effective local implementation to sustain poverty alleviation achievements and support rural revitalization [4].