为改革提供“试验空间” 科创板“1+6”配套规则引热议

Core Viewpoint - The establishment of the Sci-Tech Innovation Growth Layer is expected to enhance market stability, reduce reform resistance, and provide a controllable "experimental space" for incremental institutional reforms, while also facilitating the management of unprofitable tech companies and better protecting investors' rights [1][2]. Group 1: Sci-Tech Innovation Growth Layer - The Sci-Tech Innovation Growth Layer primarily serves technology companies that have significant breakthroughs, broad commercial prospects, and substantial ongoing R&D investments, but are currently unprofitable [2]. - The introduction of the Sci-Tech Innovation Growth Layer is seen as a key component in building a multi-tiered capital market ecosystem that supports technological innovation, reflecting the increasing institutional inclusiveness and adaptability of China's capital market [3][4]. - The stock symbols for companies listed in the Sci-Tech Innovation Growth Layer will include a special identifier "U" to help investors distinguish between new and existing stocks in this layer [3]. Group 2: Pre-Review Mechanism - The pre-review mechanism allows eligible tech companies to submit their IPO application documents for internal review by the exchange before formal submission, which aims to improve the quality and efficiency of the official application process [6][7]. - The pre-review process and its results will remain confidential until the formal application is submitted, ensuring that the information disclosure obligations are not diminished [6][7]. - The introduction of the pre-review mechanism is expected to help high-quality tech companies reduce the burden of formal review procedures, while maintaining strict adherence to existing rules and standards [6][7]. Group 3: Professional Institutional Investors - The introduction of the Professional Institutional Investor Guidelines aims to leverage the expertise of seasoned investors to better identify the innovative attributes and commercial potential of tech companies [8][9]. - This system is viewed as a significant step towards enhancing the efficiency of capital market resource allocation by utilizing the insights of top venture capital and industry funds [8][9]. - Unlike foreign markets, the pilot program for professional institutional investors in the Sci-Tech Innovation Board is limited to companies applying under the fifth set of listing standards and does not constitute a new listing requirement [9].