Core Viewpoint - The preliminary investigation report by the Indian Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) on the June 12 crash of an Air India Boeing 787 attributes the accident to the fuel supply being cut off to both engines during a critical ascent phase, raising significant concerns among aviation safety experts regarding the plausibility of pilot error [3][5]. Group 1: Accident Details - The crash resulted in 274 fatalities, including 33 ground personnel [1]. - The AAIB report indicates that both fuel switches were simultaneously turned from "on" to "off," leading to the engines losing fuel supply [3]. - The cockpit recordings revealed a conversation between the pilots questioning the fuel switch actions, but the report did not clarify their identities [3]. Group 2: Expert Opinions - Aviation safety experts have expressed disbelief at the report's findings, noting that the design of the Boeing 787's fuel switches requires multiple actions to operate, making accidental activation highly unlikely [3]. - Experts suggest that if the pilots intentionally shut off the fuel supply, such behavior would be considered irrational [3]. Group 3: Reactions to the Report - The report has faced criticism for failing to address the underlying reasons for the fuel switch being turned off, whether due to human error or technical malfunction [5]. - Families of the victims have accused Air India and the Indian government of deflecting blame onto the pilots and obscuring the truth [5]. - The Indian Pilots Association criticized the report for its lack of transparency and professionalism, suggesting a bias against the pilots [6]. Group 4: Regulatory Context - According to international aviation regulations, preliminary accident reports should be released within a month of the incident, with a complete report expected within 12 months [6].
印坠机事故初步调查报告引多方不满,遇难者家属:“一派胡言,无法接受”