Huan Qiu Shi Bao·2025-07-14 22:48Core Insights - The ongoing conflict in Gaza has resulted in significant casualties, with over 58,000 reported deaths, while some Western companies are profiting from the situation, particularly U.S. defense and tech firms [1] - Allegations have emerged that U.S. military contractors are inciting war, with specific companies like Palantir being implicated in providing AI services that exacerbate the crisis [2][3] - The use of AI systems, particularly Palantir's "Mosaic," has raised concerns about the reliability of intelligence used to justify military actions against Iran, as the conclusions drawn were based on algorithmic predictions rather than solid evidence [4][12] Group 1: Military and Defense Companies - U.S. military contractors, including Lockheed Martin and General Dynamics, are positioned to benefit from the conflict, with Lockheed Martin being a key supplier of F-35 fighter jets to Israel [6] - The presence of military representatives on media platforms has been noted, where they advocate for increased military intervention, suggesting a direct link between media narratives and corporate interests [2] - The report indicates that 48 multinational companies have aided Israel in its military actions in Gaza, with U.S. firms being particularly prominent [5] Group 2: Technology Companies - Major tech companies like Microsoft, Alphabet (Google's parent company), and Amazon have been criticized for their roles in supporting Israeli military operations through cloud computing and AI technologies [6][7] - The "Project Nimbus" contract between Google, Amazon, and the Israeli government, valued at $1.2 billion, has raised ethical concerns among employees regarding its potential military applications [7][8] - Microsoft and OpenAI have seen increased usage of their AI technologies by the Israeli military, despite claims of no direct collaboration [9] Group 3: AI and Intelligence Systems - The "Mosaic" AI system, developed by Palantir, was used to analyze over 400 million data points to generate a report suggesting Iran could produce nuclear weapons imminently, which was pivotal in justifying military actions [3][4] - Critics have labeled the "Mosaic" system as unreliable, arguing that it relies on speculative analysis rather than concrete evidence, leading to potential misinterpretations of intelligence [4][12] - The implications of AI in warfare are profound, with concerns that algorithm-driven decisions could replace verified intelligence, fundamentally altering the nature of military engagement [12]