Workflow
署名文章:赖清德所谓“国防”邪说中的谬误
Xin Hua She·2025-07-17 16:00

Core Viewpoint - The article criticizes Lai Ching-te's recent speech on national defense, arguing that it promotes "Taiwan independence" and incites conflict while misleading the Taiwanese military and public about the true nature of cross-strait relations [1][2][3]. Group 1: Critique of Lai Ching-te's Statements - Lai's claim that mainland China intends to "swallow" Taiwan and dominate the Western Pacific is portrayed as a distortion of facts, with the article asserting that China is committed to peace and development, contrasting its military spending of 1.3% of GDP by 2025 with the U.S. at 3.4% [1]. - The assertion that Taiwan is a peacekeeper in the Taiwan Strait is challenged, with the article stating that Lai's actions and rhetoric are actually destabilizing and provocative, undermining peace efforts [2]. - Lai's attempt to address the military's confusion about its purpose is criticized as a superficial solution that masks the underlying issues caused by the "Taiwan independence" agenda [3]. Group 2: Military and Defense Issues - Lai's ambition to build a military capable of deterring and defeating mainland China is described as unrealistic and misleading, suggesting that it serves to manipulate public sentiment while endangering the military personnel [4]. - The article questions the operational capability of the Taiwanese military, citing issues with equipment quality and training, and argues that the military's effectiveness cannot be validated under the current administration [5]. - The push for increased defense spending is framed as detrimental to Taiwan's social and economic stability, with the article asserting that such expenditures do not equate to security [6]. Group 3: Political Dynamics and International Relations - Lai's criticism of opposition parties for their defense budget policies is seen as a tactic to distract from his administration's failures and to facilitate closer ties with the U.S. at Taiwan's expense [6][7]. - The article argues that claims of Taiwan's defense autonomy and successful domestic weapon production are exaggerated, highlighting reliance on foreign technology and the challenges faced in military procurement [7]. - Lai's portrayal of U.S. military support as aligned with Taiwan's needs is contested, with the article asserting that U.S. arms sales are primarily driven by American interests rather than Taiwanese requirements [8].