美国“地方状告联邦”戏码再度上演，20州起诉联邦政府终止防灾减灾计划

Core Points - The lawsuit filed by 20 Democratic-led states against the Trump administration highlights the alleged illegal cancellation of the BRIC program, which is crucial for disaster preparedness funding [1][2] - The lawsuit argues that the unilateral termination of the BRIC program violates the principle of separation of powers, as the program's functions and funding were authorized by Congress [2] - The BRIC program, established in 2018, was designed to enhance disaster resilience through funding for infrastructure projects, and its cancellation has significant implications for disaster response across multiple states [2][3] Group 1 - The lawsuit was initiated by attorneys general from states including California, Massachusetts, Washington, and New York, emphasizing the importance of federal resources in disaster response [1] - The plaintiffs are seeking a preliminary ruling to restore the disaster funding that was cut, arguing that the decision to terminate the program was made by an acting FEMA director without proper authority [2] - FEMA's abrupt cancellation of the BRIC program in April was criticized for being politically motivated and detrimental to public safety, with $4.5 billion in approved but unused funds being retracted [3]