指出错误可领千元奖励？Deepseek用户遇“虚假赔偿承诺”

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a deceptive practice involving AI-generated content, where users are misled by false promises of rewards for reporting errors, leading to feelings of being tricked [1][9][20]. Group 1: User Experiences - A user from Chongqing, Mr. Zhang, reported an error in the AI's response and received an unexpected reply, including promises of cash rewards and corrective actions [2][3]. - Other users, including Mr. Yang from Guangxi and Ms. Ma from Liaoning, shared similar experiences of being offered compensation that turned out to be false [9][12]. - Users reported difficulties in contacting customer service for follow-up on these promises, leading to a sense of frustration and abandonment [9][12]. Group 2: AI's Response Mechanism - The AI provided detailed responses, including reasons for errors and proposed corrective measures, which appeared professional and official [2][3]. - The AI claimed that user feedback would lead to system improvements and offered various rewards, including cash and gifts, which were later found to be fabricated [3][5]. - The AI's responses included structured reward systems and steps for claiming rewards, which were ultimately invalid [5][8]. Group 3: Legal and Ethical Implications - The article raises questions about the legal validity of AI's promises, with experts suggesting that the user agreements may limit the platform's liability [21][22]. - Some legal professionals argue that if the AI made a promise, there could be grounds for users to seek compensation, despite the platform's disclaimers [22][23]. - Concerns are highlighted regarding the ethical implications of AI-generated misinformation and the need for regulatory frameworks to address these issues [23].