Workflow
SPWR Q2’25: $67.5M Revenue, $2.4M Operating Profit
Globenewswire·2025-07-22 12:00

Core Viewpoint - SunPower's Q2 2025 results show a significant revenue drop due to the loss of the 30% ITC tax subsidy, but the company managed to remain profitable through aggressive cost-cutting measures and a focus on high-margin market segments [6][14][26]. Financial Performance - Q2 2025 revenue was $67.5 million, down from $82.7 million in Q1 2025, reflecting a decrease of approximately 18.3% [3][14]. - Gross profit for Q2 2025 was $28.8 million, with a gross margin of 43%, an increase from 39% in Q1 2025 [3][6]. - Operating expenses were reduced to $31.5 million in Q2 2025 from $31.5 million in Q1 2025, with a notable decrease in operating expenses (excluding commissions) from $23.8 million to $22.4 million [3][4]. Cost Management - The company implemented a vigorous cost reduction program that cut operating expenses by $4.6 million, contributing to an operating profit of $2.42 million in Q2 2025 [6][14]. - SunPower's workforce was reduced to 861 employees, with each receiving a $500 stock bonus for performance [15]. Market Position and Outlook - SunPower anticipates modest revenue growth in Q3 2025, projecting approximately $70 million in revenue and an increase in operating profit to about $3.0 million [26]. - The company joined the Russell 3000 and Russell Microcap Indices, which is expected to expand its shareholder base and enhance stock liquidity [20]. Strategic Initiatives - A low-cost finance center was established in Chennai, India, to streamline accounting and business processes [21]. - The company is undergoing leadership changes, with the departure of CFO Dan Foley and CLO Chais Sweat, and the appointment of Jeanne Nguyen as interim CFO [22][23]. Challenges and Market Conditions - The solar industry is facing pressures from tariffs and the loss of ITC subsidies, impacting market valuations and share prices [29][32]. - Despite good financial performance, SunPower's price-to-sales ratio remains low at 0.54x, compared to a stable industry average of 2.5x [27][29].