Workflow
科技部,重磅发布!
Zhong Guo Ji Jin Bao·2025-07-23 16:18

Core Viewpoint - The Ministry of Science and Technology of China has released the "Ethical Guidelines for the Research and Development of Driving Automation Technology," emphasizing the need for objective and accurate communication regarding the capabilities of driving automation systems [1][2]. Group 1: Ethical Principles - The guidelines adhere to principles such as prioritizing safety, respecting life, ensuring fairness and justice, and guaranteeing informed consent and information transparency [2]. - The principle of safety prioritization requires that the research and application of driving automation technology must consider user and public safety, especially in unavoidable traffic accidents or extreme driving conditions [2][3]. Group 2: Risk Management and Data Privacy - The development of driving automation technology should include comprehensive risk monitoring and emergency mechanisms to control potential threats [3]. - A robust data privacy protection mechanism throughout the data lifecycle must be established, following principles of informed consent, minimal necessity, and de-identification [3]. Group 3: Responsibility Classification - The guidelines classify driving automation into six levels (0 to 5) based on the system's ability to perform dynamic driving tasks, with responsibilities assigned according to the level of automation and operational conditions [4][5]. - Levels 2 and below are categorized as advanced driver assistance, where the human driver is typically the responsible party [6]. - Levels 3 and 4 involve shared responsibility between users and the automated system, while level 5 places primary responsibility on the automated system unless the user intervenes [7]. Group 4: Public Communication and Misunderstanding Prevention - Developers and producers must clearly communicate the functionality, usage conditions, and precautions of driving automation products to the public [7]. - It is essential to clarify and correct any misinformation that may lead to public misunderstanding of driving automation technology, guiding users to use the products correctly and avoid misuse [7].