最高法定调，烂尾楼业主可追款

Core Points - The Supreme People's Court has implemented an interpretation regarding the legal issues related to the execution of objections in lawsuits, providing stronger legal protection for homebuyers affected by unfinished buildings [1][3] - The interpretation addresses the common issue of "difficulty in refunding" for homebuyers when contracts are terminated due to non-delivery of properties, allowing courts to support requests for the return of payments from the property sale proceeds [3] Summary by Sections Legal Framework - The interpretation consists of 23 articles that clarify specific rules for protecting the rights of homebuyers, including handling of paid amounts after contract termination and property registration requests [3] - It particularly targets the issue of unfinished buildings, offering a solution for homeowners whose contracts have been terminated [3] Financial Implications - Article 12 of the interpretation allows homeowners of unfinished buildings to file an objection lawsuit if the court has frozen the developer's pre-sale funds, enabling the potential release of these funds for refunds to homebuyers [3] - This change means that previously frozen pre-sale funds can be utilized under certain conditions, enhancing the financial recourse available to affected buyers [3] Impact on Homebuyers - The interpretation expands the protection for homebuyers from "housing needs" to "living needs," removing the restriction on "only housing" and easing the recognition of property types [3] - Legal experts believe this development is significant for homeowners of unfinished buildings, providing much-needed support in resolving refund disputes with developers and courts [3]