Core Points - The Supreme People's Court has emphasized the need to focus credit punishment on behaviors that evade, avoid, or resist execution, while distinguishing between "dishonest" and "unable" individuals [1][2] - Since the implementation of the dishonest person list system in October 2013, 17.1 million individuals have voluntarily fulfilled their legal obligations due to credit punishment and consumption restrictions [1] - In 2024, the number of new entries into the dishonest person list decreased by 23.4% to 2.457 million, while 2.821 million individuals returned to the market through credit repair, marking a 35.4% increase [2] Group 1 - The Supreme People's Court has released nine typical cases to strengthen the classification of "dishonest" and "unable" individuals, aiming to enhance the precision and convenience of credit punishment [1] - The overall trend of credit punishment work is showing a positive pattern of "reducing existing cases and curbing new ones" [2] - Courts are required to strictly follow legal conditions and procedures when adding individuals to the dishonest person list, ensuring a comprehensive assessment of the reasons for non-fulfillment of obligations [2] Group 2 - A specific case highlighted the balance between enforcement and compassion, where a defendant was found to be unable to fulfill obligations due to life difficulties, leading to a resolution through judicial assistance [3]
最高法:把信用惩戒聚焦到规避执行、逃避执行、抗拒执行行为
Zhong Guo Xin Wen Wang·2025-07-25 05:44