WNS vs. TRI: Which Stock Is the Better Value Option?

Core Viewpoint - The comparison between WNS (Holdings) Limited and Thomson Reuters (TRI) indicates that WNS is more attractive to value investors based on various financial metrics and rankings [1]. Group 1: Zacks Rank and Earnings Outlook - WNS currently has a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy), while TRI has a Zacks Rank of 4 (Sell), suggesting a more favorable earnings outlook for WNS [3]. - The Zacks Rank system emphasizes companies with positive earnings estimate revisions, indicating that WNS is likely experiencing an improvement in its earnings outlook compared to TRI [3]. Group 2: Valuation Metrics - WNS has a forward P/E ratio of 16.25, significantly lower than TRI's forward P/E of 52.78, indicating that WNS may be undervalued relative to TRI [5]. - The PEG ratio for WNS is 1.88, while TRI's PEG ratio is 6.39, further suggesting that WNS is more attractive in terms of expected earnings growth [5]. - WNS has a P/B ratio of 4.13 compared to TRI's P/B of 7.53, reinforcing the notion that WNS is undervalued [6]. Group 3: Value Grades - Based on the analysis of various metrics, WNS holds a Value grade of B, while TRI has a Value grade of F, indicating a stronger position for WNS among value investors [6].