“19%对0”?!菲律宾炸锅了

Group 1 - The agreement allows the Philippines to open its market to the US with zero tariffs, while the US imposes a 19% tariff on Philippine imports, leading to significant backlash in the Philippines [1][2] - Key political figures in the Philippines have criticized the agreement as unfair, with Senator Panfilo Lacson calling it a "disgraceful insult" and Senator Imee Marcos stating it is a unilateral compromise rather than a victory [2] - Public sentiment in the Philippines is strongly against the agreement, with social media users labeling it as "new colonialism" and questioning the country's status as a true ally of the US [2] Group 2 - Concerns have been raised about the potential economic impact of the agreement, with Congressman Antonio Tinio warning that it could turn the Philippines into a dumping ground for US goods, adversely affecting local industries [5] - The disparity in tariffs is highlighted by the example of Philippine soy sauce facing a 19% tariff in the US while US ketchup is sold in Manila at zero tariffs, illustrating the real-life implications of the agreement [5] - The agreement has sparked a national debate among Filipinos about whether to continue as a subordinate ally in a US-centered trade system or to seek a more equitable and independent development path through multilateral cooperation [5]