Group 1 - A recent closed testing of 36 popular models equipped with driver assistance systems revealed that none achieved a perfect score, with an overall average pass rate of only 35.73% [1] - The test results starkly contrast with the claims made by automakers, leading to widespread controversy and skepticism regarding the testing methods and processes [1] - The debate surrounding the test has transcended technical issues, highlighting deeper industry contradictions regarding the rapid evolution of smart driving technology and the need for a more robust testing framework [1] Group 2 - The head of the Traffic Management Bureau of the Ministry of Public Security stated that currently sold vehicles in China with "smart driving" systems do not possess "autonomous driving" capabilities [1] - Future efforts will focus on conducting comprehensive tests to clarify the boundaries of system functions and safety response measures, aiming to eliminate exaggeration and false advertising [1] - The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology emphasized the importance of validating combined driving assistance tests during a recent meeting, indicating a push for improved testing standards [1][2] Group 3 - The improvement of the smart driving testing system requires acceleration to meet industry needs and enhance information symmetry, allowing consumers to better understand the capabilities and limitations of smart driving [2] - Long-term safety in smart driving relies on both rapid technological advancements and the establishment of a reliable testing framework [2] - The controversy sparked by the testing may serve as a catalyst for the industry to transition from "chaotic growth" to "regulated development," with a focus on clear standards and responsibilities for automakers [2]
智驾评测引争议 测试体系亟需“定盘星”
Zheng Quan Shi Bao·2025-07-28 18:05