中国AI全球36%！万斯慌了：再这么搞，美国只能吃剩饭！

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent initiatives by former President Trump to boost the U.S. AI industry, drawing parallels with China's approach to technology development and highlighting the challenges and opportunities faced by both countries in the AI sector [1][6]. Group 1: U.S. AI Initiatives - Trump signed three executive orders aimed at accelerating the U.S. AI industry, reflecting a sense of urgency to prevent the U.S. from falling behind China [1]. - The proposed "Stargate" super data center project, estimated at $500 billion, has faced significant delays due to environmental regulations and market competition from China [3]. - The U.S. AI market is under pressure as 36% of global AI models are produced in China, with domestic companies like DeepSeek achieving a market size exceeding $120 billion [3]. Group 2: Trump's "Three Axes" Strategy - The first axis involves correcting perceived ideological biases in AI, particularly against the backdrop of the DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) policies that have influenced AI development [4]. - The second axis focuses on prioritizing AI development over environmental concerns, with Trump threatening to cut federal funding for states that impede AI infrastructure projects due to environmental regulations [5]. - The third axis aims to relax export restrictions on AI technologies, potentially allowing products like ChatGPT to enter markets in Hong Kong and Taiwan, thereby countering China's influence [5]. Group 3: China's Position in AI - Despite concerns over U.S. initiatives, China recognizes opportunities, particularly in self-research and development of chips, as reliance on U.S. technology poses risks [6]. - Chinese AI models are criticized for excessive censorship, suggesting a need for more freedom in AI development to enhance user experience [6]. - The "Belt and Road" initiative is seen as a way to expand China's AI influence globally, with significant contracts signed at international events indicating a strong demand for Chinese AI solutions [6]. Conclusion - The competition in the AI sector highlights the contrasting approaches of the U.S. and China, with the U.S. adopting a more centralized strategy in response to fears of losing technological supremacy [7]. - The outcome of this AI race will depend on factors such as chip technology, data availability, and global outreach strategies [7].