Elliman (DOUG) Q2 Revenue Drops 5%

Core Insights - Douglas Elliman reported a 5% year-over-year decline in revenue for Q2 2025, totaling $271.4 million compared to $285.8 million in Q2 2024 [1][5] - The company experienced a significant increase in net loss, reaching $22.7 million, with a diluted loss per share of $0.27 [6] - Adjusted EBITDA swung from a positive $2.9 million in the prior year to a negative $(0.8) million, indicating underlying operational challenges [6][12] Financial Performance - Revenue for Q2 2025 was $271.4 million, down from $285.8 million in Q2 2024, reflecting a 5% decrease [2][5] - Gross Transaction Value (GTV) decreased to $10.2 billion from $10.6 billion, a decline of 3.8% year-over-year [2][7] - The number of transactions fell to 5,530 from 5,885, although the average price per transaction remained strong at $1.84 million [7][11] Profitability Metrics - Net loss expanded to $22.7 million, with an adjusted net loss of $4.7 million compared to $0.5 million in the prior year [6][11] - Adjusted EPS (Non-GAAP, Diluted) was $(0.06), a deterioration from $(0.01) in Q2 2024, reflecting a 500% increase in losses [2][6] - Operating expenses remained high, with real estate agent commissions at $204.6 million and sales and marketing expenses at $20.1 million [9][10] Business Strategy and Focus - The company aims to strengthen its luxury brand and expand in growth markets while leveraging property technology (PropTech) [4][11] - Management emphasized the importance of maintaining a trusted reputation and attracting top-tier agents to drive transaction volume [4][11] - There were no updates on agent recruitment, new office openings, or PropTech rollouts during the quarter [11][12] Future Outlook - Management did not provide specific forward guidance for revenue or earnings for the remainder of fiscal 2025 [12] - The focus remains on long-term value creation and investments in core markets and technology, but without clear financial targets for the second half of the year [12][13] - Future results will depend on market dynamics and the company's ability to convert its brand strength into transaction growth [13]