Di Yi Cai Jing·2025-08-02 07:00Group 1 - The performance of low-cost airlines in the domestic market contrasts with that in the U.S., as evidenced by the shutdown of Jetstar Asia due to rising supplier costs, airport fees, and increased competition [1] - Jetstar Asia, which was established in 2004 and primarily operated short-haul flights from Singapore, is projected to incur a loss of AUD 35 million in EBITDA for the current fiscal year [1] - Other low-cost airlines, such as Spirit Airlines and Canada Jetlines, have also ceased operations, indicating a broader trend of challenges faced by low-cost carriers post-pandemic [1] Group 2 - In the U.S., full-service airlines have recovered faster due to a quicker rebound in business travel, while low-cost carriers have lagged behind [2] - Southwest Airlines has begun to diversify its offerings by introducing premium seating options and upgrading cabin services to attract cost-conscious travelers seeking better service [2] - In contrast, domestic airlines like Spring Airlines have thrived post-pandemic, with Spring Airlines achieving the highest net profit among listed airlines in 2023, and projected to remain the most profitable in 2024 [2][3] Group 3 - The differing fates of low-cost airlines in China and abroad can be attributed to temporary oversupply in the domestic market and changes in passenger demographics leading to revenue declines [3] - Spring Airlines has adopted a hybrid cabin layout, offering "business economy seats" with increased legroom, similar to the changes made by Southwest Airlines [3] - Airlines are increasingly required to develop a diverse service product system to meet the varied demands of low, medium, and high-end customers while simultaneously reducing costs and expanding revenue sources [4]