Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen·2025-08-02 08:00Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding the collision test video involving the Ideal i8 and a Chenglong truck has sparked significant public attention, with Chenglong Truck calling for rational evaluation based on scientific principles and emphasizing the importance of road safety and adherence to traffic regulations [2][3][15]. Group 1: Chenglong Truck's Response - Chenglong Truck issued a statement addressing the use of its vehicle in the collision test video, asserting that the testing conditions were significantly different from real traffic scenarios and urging the public to view the situation rationally [2]. - The company emphasized the importance of following traffic laws, regular maintenance, and proactive safety awareness as more effective measures for ensuring safety than any test [3]. - Chenglong Truck's legal department is currently handling the situation, indicating that they believe the video misrepresents their brand and could mislead consumers [6][15]. Group 2: Ideal Automotive's Position - Ideal Automotive defended the collision test, stating it was conducted by a third-party testing agency and adhered to all relevant standards, with no manipulation of vehicle parameters [14]. - The company expressed confidence in the authority of the testing agency and suggested a live retest to validate the results, indicating transparency in their testing process [14]. Group 3: Industry Reactions - The incident has drawn attention from the industry, with Dongfeng Group supporting Chenglong Truck in protecting its legal rights and brand reputation [3]. - The collision test video has generated considerable debate online, with many users questioning the validity of the test and expressing concerns about the safety implications of the results [4][6].