Zheng Quan Ri Bao Zhi Sheng·2025-08-03 16:09Core Viewpoint - The recent criminal accountability for financial fraud among listed companies reflects the effective implementation of the regulatory framework aimed at combating financial misconduct in the capital market [1][2][4]. Group 1: Criminal Accountability - In July, five listed companies disclosed that their actual controllers and executives faced criminal charges due to financial fraud, including measures taken by law enforcement and court actions [1][2]. - The actual controller of Zhejiang Haiyan Liyuan Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. received a one-year prison sentence (with a one-and-a-half-year probation) and a fine of 3.3 million yuan for violating information disclosure laws [2]. - The trend indicates a significant increase in criminal accountability, with a focus on primary offenders, particularly actual controllers and key executives [2][3]. Group 2: Multi-Dimensional Accountability - Companies are facing both criminal and civil liabilities, establishing a multi-dimensional accountability system that has become the norm [3][5]. - For instance, Jinzhou Port has faced 23 lawsuits related to securities fraud, amounting to 5.5392 million yuan in claims [3]. - This dual approach aims to deter fraud and protect investor rights, creating a governance loop that discourages fraudulent activities [3]. Group 3: Regulatory Framework and Governance - The regulatory environment has been strengthened since the issuance of comprehensive guidelines by multiple government agencies to enhance the accountability mechanisms against financial fraud [4][6]. - The focus is on ensuring that all responsible parties, including executives and even supply chain personnel, are held accountable, promoting a shift from mere compliance to substantive responsibility [5]. - Recommendations include improving legislative measures, expediting case processing, and expanding the scope of accountability to include intermediary institutions [6].