综合价值管理赋能上市公司形成四大合力

Core Viewpoint - The core argument emphasizes that listed companies are not solely the assets of major shareholders but are jointly owned by diverse investors, necessitating the transformation of differing expectations into collaborative development to enhance comprehensive value management [1][2]. Group 1: Importance of Diverse Investor Participation - The trend of socialized equity structure in China's A-share market shows a decline in the proportion of institutional holdings from 50.7% in 2018 to 42.0% in 2024, indicating an increase in the influence of individual and institutional investors [3]. - Attracting diverse social capital is crucial for the development of listed companies, especially in sectors like biotechnology and information technology, where early-stage investments are vital for overcoming innovation challenges [4]. Group 2: Comprehensive Value Management - Comprehensive value management aims to align the interests of various investors, addressing the financial stability needs of financial investors, the innovation expectations of industrial investors, and the social responsibility demands of societal investors [8]. - Companies should elevate comprehensive value management to a strategic level, integrating financial, industrial, and social value dimensions into their evaluation systems [8]. Group 3: Addressing Investor Discrepancies - Discrepancies between major shareholders and minority investors pose challenges in decision-making regarding profit distribution, mergers, and R&D investments, necessitating a balanced approach to governance [10][11]. - Companies should optimize shareholder checks and balances to foster collaboration between major and minor shareholders, ensuring that both long-term growth and short-term returns are addressed [12]. Group 4: Innovation and Technology Development - Disparities in understanding technology innovation between industrial investors and company management can hinder progress, necessitating a collaborative approach to decision-making in technology paths and innovation outcomes [14][16]. - Companies should establish processes that involve both management and industrial investors in technology decisions to align their interests and enhance innovation [16]. Group 5: Risk Sharing Mechanisms - Financial and industrial investors often have differing risk preferences, complicating the establishment of effective risk-sharing mechanisms in innovation [19][21]. - Companies should adopt diversified financing strategies to distribute risks among various investor groups, enhancing stability and flexibility in funding [21]. Group 6: Balancing Economic and Social Value - Social investors prioritize long-term societal impacts over short-term economic benefits, creating potential conflicts in corporate decision-making [24]. - Companies must recognize the influence of social perceptions on their investment value and strive to balance economic performance with social responsibility [25][26].