Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the significant performance disparity between actively managed equity funds and thematic ETFs, particularly in the context of the booming human-robot and innovative drug sectors [1][2][4] - The number of "doubling funds" in the innovative drug sector reached 17 by July 29, with 10 being actively managed equity funds and 7 being thematic ETFs, showcasing the strong performance of these funds [2][3] - Actively managed equity funds have achieved substantial excess returns due to stock-picking abilities, but their scale expansion has lagged behind that of ETFs, which have benefited from the strong market performance of specific sectors [2][3] Group 2 - Data shows that the 10 actively managed innovative drug funds had a total scale of 9.4 billion yuan at the end of Q2, with an increase of 5.8 billion yuan during the quarter, while the 7 ETFs saw an increase of 12.9 billion yuan, reaching 28.4 billion yuan [3] - The rapid growth of ETFs is attributed to their passive tracking mechanism, which allows them to capture industry beta returns effectively, leading investors to prefer ETFs for quick exposure to high-growth sectors [4][5] - The rise of ETFs has created competitive pressure on actively managed equity funds, which are struggling to attract new investments despite their strong performance [5][6] Group 3 - The article notes that the existence of actively managed equity funds remains valuable, as they can smooth out volatility through strategic stock selection, contrasting with the automatic rebalancing of ETFs [6][7] - The current trend indicates that passive products like ETFs are more attractive to investors, prompting actively managed funds to seek differentiated strategies for survival [7] - The article warns that while ETFs offer convenience, investors should be cautious of their short-term speculative nature, which can exacerbate market volatility [8]
年内“翻倍基”清一色创新药主题 主动权益赢得业绩主题ETF赚足规模
Zheng Quan Shi Bao·2025-08-03 19:32