信用价值重构下企业信用修复研究

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the need for a unified and categorized credit repair system in China, addressing existing issues such as fragmented regulations and insufficient technological support to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of credit repair processes [1][12]. Group 1: Current Status and Achievements of Credit Repair - The credit repair system in China has evolved under a framework of "central coordination, local exploration, and government leadership," with significant policy developments since 2014 [2][3]. - As of May 2023, over 40 local regulations related to social credit have been established, indicating a robust local policy environment [3]. - The establishment of a national credit information sharing platform has led to the collection of over 807 billion pieces of credit information, significantly enhancing the credit repair mechanism [6]. Group 2: Technological Infrastructure and Innovations - The integration of digital technologies has transformed credit repair from a passive to an active service model, with the establishment of a unified enterprise credit information platform since 2015 [4]. - The "Credit China" platform utilizes advanced technologies such as big data and AI to create a comprehensive credit repair network, improving automation and compliance in the credit repair process [4]. - Local innovations, such as AI-driven systems for credit application reviews, have further optimized credit repair services [4]. Group 3: Involvement of Third-Party Service Providers - The participation of third-party service institutions in credit repair is increasing, with 13 institutions authorized to provide training and 62 institutions qualified to issue credit repair reports [5]. - These institutions play a crucial role in enhancing the professionalism and standardization of credit repair services [5]. Group 4: Challenges in Credit Repair - The current credit repair system faces challenges such as fragmented regulations and insufficient inter-departmental collaboration, leading to increased costs and inefficiencies for enterprises [7][8]. - There is a notable disparity in technological capabilities across regions, resulting in data governance issues and "data silos" that hinder effective credit repair [8]. - The limited involvement of third-party institutions and the lack of a cohesive training mechanism further complicate the credit repair landscape [9][10]. Group 5: Policy Recommendations for Improvement - Recommendations include establishing a comprehensive credit repair legal framework, enhancing inter-departmental collaboration, and leveraging technology to improve efficiency [12][13][14]. - Encouraging deeper involvement of third-party institutions in the credit repair ecosystem is essential for transitioning to a dual-driven model of government oversight and market services [15][16].