每经热评︱汽车安全碰撞测试应有“标准红线” 不能成为“博眼球”的表演

Core Viewpoint - The recent crash test video involving Li Auto's i8 and a Chenglong truck has sparked heated discussions regarding the standards of automotive safety collision testing in China [1] Group 1: Collision Testing Standards - Automotive safety collision testing is a crucial method for assessing vehicle safety performance, including body structure safety and occupant protection capabilities [1] - China's automotive collision testing system is primarily based on C-NCAP and C-IASI, which have clear mandatory standards [1] - The recent crash test was not conducted under official standards, as it was acknowledged by the China Automotive Research staff that it was for "vehicle development validation" rather than a formal test [1] Group 2: Issues with Third-Party Testing - When automakers pay third-party organizations for crash tests, there is a lack of unified standards in testing processes, parameter settings, and vehicle preparations, leading to potential disputes over results [2] - Key information regarding the test conditions, such as whether the truck was empty or if the cabin locking structure was functioning properly, has not been fully disclosed, making it difficult for the public to assess the scientific validity of the test [2] - The automotive industry in China has seen an increase in controversial tests, reflecting the marketing anxiety of car manufacturers and leading to a deviation from standard testing practices [2] Group 3: Need for Regulation and Transparency - Experts have warned that when safety tests become mere spectacles, the credibility of real safety standards is compromised [3] - There is an urgent need to establish clear "red lines" in the automotive safety testing market, enhancing regulations and transparency for third-party testing organizations [3] - Regulatory bodies should strengthen oversight of the automotive testing market, develop comprehensive industry standards, and clarify the boundaries for self-testing by companies to ensure the scientific and impartial nature of test results [3]