Workflow
理想i8对撞乘龙卡车,吵翻天不如法庭见
Nan Fang Du Shi Bao·2025-08-04 12:09

Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding the crash test conducted by Li Auto has sparked a significant public relations battle among the involved parties, including Li Auto, Dongfeng Liuqi, and the testing agency, China Automotive Research Institute [2][3][4]. Group 1: Li Auto's Position - Li Auto stated that the crash test was commissioned to assess the safety of its i8 vehicle and did not intend to evaluate the safety of other brands, specifically Dongfeng Liuqi's truck [2][3]. - Despite claiming no intention to cause harm, Li Auto's testing process led to the identification of the truck involved, prompting a backlash from Dongfeng Liuqi [3][4]. - Li Auto is urged to issue a sincere apology and actively engage in addressing the controversy stemming from the test [3]. Group 2: Dongfeng Liuqi's Response - Dongfeng Liuqi responded to the test results by asserting that the testing conditions were not representative of real-world scenarios, and they have initiated legal procedures to address the situation [2][4]. - The company criticized the test for being misleading and questioned the integrity of the testing parameters, suggesting that the test was designed to favor Li Auto [4][5]. - Dongfeng Liuqi's official statements emphasized their commitment to quality and reliability, attempting to counter the negative publicity generated by the crash test [2][3]. Group 3: China Automotive Research Institute's Role - China Automotive Research Institute clarified that the test was not a standard vehicle-to-vehicle collision test and was solely focused on Li Auto's vehicle safety [2][4]. - The institute is expected to maintain all legal documents and test data in light of potential legal actions from Dongfeng Liuqi [4][5]. - The agency's involvement has raised questions about the transparency and credibility of the testing process, with calls for a more open and rigorous safety evaluation [4].