“别人家小区”召开物业费返还大会，为何多数人只能在旁羡慕

Core Viewpoint - Recent cases of property management companies returning funds to homeowners in cities like Chengdu, Guangzhou, and Wuhan have garnered attention, as most homeowners have not experienced such refunds before [1][2] Group 1: Property Management Practices - Property management services are divided into two systems: commission-based and fixed-price. Only commission-based systems can return surplus property fees, with less than 8% of key cities operating under this model [2][8] - The majority of properties operate under a fixed-price system, where any surplus is not returned to homeowners, while commission-based systems are primarily found in high-end residential areas [7][8] - Chengdu has seen a slight increase in commission-based management, rising to about 10% due to recent policy changes [8] Group 2: Homeowner Associations and Management - Effective management of public revenue in residential areas relies heavily on the operation of homeowner associations (HOAs), which are often underrepresented across the country [2][12] - In some successful cases, such as the Baoli Lianghe Forest community in Chengdu, the HOA has effectively managed surplus funds and returned them to homeowners [3][6] - The establishment of HOAs is crucial for the oversight and management of public revenue, yet many areas still struggle with low HOA coverage and weak homeowner autonomy [12] Group 3: Public Revenue Management - Public revenue sources include parking fees, advertising income, and other communal earnings, which are often poorly managed and lack transparency [10][12] - Recent policies in seven provinces and cities have been introduced to clarify the ownership and management of public revenue, emphasizing that these funds belong to all homeowners [10][11] - The management of public revenue is increasingly being regulated, with requirements for separate bank accounts and transparent accounting practices [11][12] Group 4: Challenges and Opportunities - The transition from fixed-price to commission-based management can yield positive results, as seen in some cases where property fees have not only been recouped but have also led to increased property values [8][12] - However, the reluctance of large property management companies to switch to commission-based systems poses a challenge, as it affects their profit margins and control over funds [9][12] - The push for transparency and effective management of public revenue is essential for enhancing homeowner rights and ensuring sustainable property services [12][13]