Workflow
证券业稳定性保障新标准征求意见,明确组织—制度—过程“三位一体”框架
Zhong Zheng Wang·2025-08-06 07:05

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the introduction of a new standard for the stability assurance of information systems in the securities industry, aimed at enhancing operational resilience and security [1][2]. Group 1: Standard Overview - The "Securities Industry Information System Stability Assurance System Standard (Draft for Comments)" is being solicited for feedback from the industry by the China Securities Association [1]. - The standard provides a comprehensive framework for building an effective stability assurance system, emphasizing organizational, institutional, and process guarantees [1]. Group 2: Organizational Guarantees - The standard specifies requirements for organizational structure, personnel capabilities, and management of process guarantees [2]. - It proposes a dual-team structure: a vertical team focused on operational depth and a horizontal team dedicated to process optimization and technical support [2]. Group 3: Personnel Capabilities - The standard emphasizes three dimensions: capability assessment, personnel training, and human-machine collaboration [2]. - It encourages firms to establish clear competency models and explore new operational capabilities to adapt to automation and intelligence trends [2]. Group 4: Institutional Guarantees - The institutional aspect is viewed as "hard rules" for building a safety foundation, integrating regulations, technical standards, and operational procedures into a closed-loop system [2]. Group 5: Process Guarantees - The process guarantees focus on ten core processes, including stability architecture management and fault management, with clear mechanisms and evaluation elements [2]. Group 6: Industry Impact - The standard is seen as a significant shift from traditional standards, with nearly 20 industry experts contributing to its development [3]. - It aims to enhance operational resilience and proactive defense capabilities through digital means and measurable stability evaluation factors [3].